What does it mean to be authentic? Does the word have any meaning these days?
See NYT Sunday Styles, September 11, 2011.
The etymology of “authentic” is “original authority;” “one who does a thing himself, a principal, a master.” (OED). Being authentic does not mean that you should not fear what people think of you. It does not mean that you have to figure out how to be in closer proximity to who you think you are and always be there. It does not mean that you have to image yourself so that you fulfill the expectations of others. It does not mean that there is a better, truer you that, if only you could quell the internal dialogue, you could listen to so that you could express yourself “authentically.” “Authentic” means to be true to each moment and hold it with as much consciousness as one is capable while speaking and acting from this position.
How do we know ourselves well enough in any moment to act and speak without adding an extra layer, a construct, to manufacture who we are?
We have to actually “find” ourselves in the moment and allow for our personal thoughts and feelings to inform our words, behaviors, and actions, recognizing that as we communicate, we are doing so from a clear understanding of what we are thinking and feeling, right now.
To stand in presence, requires a willingness to experience and manage our thoughts, physical feelings, behaviors, and emotions side-by-side a continual stream of consciousness that informs us of the other. As we process this information and make the adjustments necessary to remain genuinely connected, we also must be vigilantly aligned with ourselves. This flow of information, “data,” is a dynamic exchange between our inner and outer world, cultivated by an ever expanding conscious container that allows for all life that is seeking our attention to be present in any given moment.
So what does this mean?
This means that we accept each moment into consciousness by paying attention and allowing ourselves to listen: to ourselves and to others. We adjust our tempo and intensity within which we act and react to the life surrounding us. When something “false” is operating, we “authentically” recognize and manage it, even disclose it if necessary.
Example: “You know, as I am trying to respond to your questions, I realize that I am moving away from what I really think. I would rather reframe the conversation and tell you exactly how I feel about the situation.”
Do people genuinely care to know who we are, or do they prefer that we manufacture who we are to meet their expectations?
By manufacturing “who” we are, we are basing our perceptions, in any given moment, on how we think people want to perceive us. And, when we meet again in the future, we have to reconstruct from memory “who” we were at that time. This is often difficult to duplicate, requiring us to continually look backwards to reconstruct who we were at the expense of who we should have been.
People will come to rest in relationship if we can consistently find that place of rest within ourselves. We must return to our origin, our original authority, and find a means of communication and behavior that allows for us to rest within a sense of personal wholeness.
Tags: RestWithin
Posted in Clarity | No Comments »